|
|
||||||||
|
|
Nutritional study among Great Andamanese |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The great Andamanese is a negrito tribe living in the Andaman group of islands. Before the British colonization, they were a predominant population in the Andaman islands. Although referred commonly as the Great Andamanese, there were at least ten sub-groups among them and each had their own language and culture. During the beginning of 20th century their population was in excess of 5,000. Most of these sub-groups have extinct. At present the Great Andamanese population consists of less then 40 individuals. A noticeable change has already happened in their culture and food habits. The impact of this transition on their health status is not fully understood. As a first step in understanding the impact of acculturation, a nutritional survey was conducted among the Great Andamanese tribe settled at Strait Island. The survey included a diet survey and nutritional anthropometry. Diet survey was done by weighment method for three consecutive days. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fig 1. Decline in the Great Andamanese population during 20th century |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lengths of children aged two years or less were measured using infantometer and the heights of others were measured using Anthropometer rod. Weights were measured using lever type weighing machines. Mid-upper arm circumference was measured using non-stretchable fibre glass measuring tapes and fat fold thickness using calipers. Mean values of anthropometric measurements for each age were calculated separately for males and females. Children under 6 years of age were classified into different nutritional grades following Gomez Classification and children below 19 years as per Waterlow classification. Body Mass Indices (BMI) were calculated for adults and they were classified into different grades of Chronic Energy Deficiency (CED) as per the cut off values suggested by WHO. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table 1. Consumption pattern of various food groups by Andamanese
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 1 shows the food group consumption profile per consumption unit (CU). Their intake of Green Leafy Vegetables (GLV), other vegetables and milk and milk products were much less than the respective recommended dietary allowances. Consumption of other forms of food was more than the recommended allowance. Meat consumption is more than eight times the recommended daily allowance and intake of oils and fats almost double the recommended allowance. Though the average consumption of most of the food groups per CU was above the recommended level, the consumption pattern differed from family to family with 33 to 67% of the families having deficient intakes of various food groups except fats, oils and meat. All the families were deficient in their intake per CU of GLVs and milk and milk products and 83% of them had deficient intake of other vegetables also. Average intakes of various nutrients per CU are given in table 3.2. Average consumption per CU for the whole community were above the recommended levels for all the nutrients except iron, Vit. A and riboflavin
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table 2. Nutrient intake pattern of Great Andamanese (* Recommended Dietary Allowance # Consumption Unit)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Average intakes of various nutrients per CU are given in table 2. Average consumption per CU for the whole community were above the recommended levels for all the nutrients except iron, Vit. A and riboflavin |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fig 2. Proportion of families with deficient intake of nutrients
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fig.2 shows the proportion of families having deficient intake of different nutrients. All the families had deficient intake of iron, Vit. A and riboflavin and none had deficiency in proteins and fat intake. In spite of rich availability of food, the dietary pattern showed gross imbalance with high deficiency in intake of green leafy vegetables, other vegetables and milk and excess intakes of meat, oils and fats. Consequently their diet is poor in iron, Vit. A, and riboflavin but excessive in energy, protein and fat. Unavailability of locally grown vegetables and operational difficulties in transporting from other islands might account for the low intake of vegetables.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||